CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859 — Page 80

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

78

M. Stace, had been allowed, during the preparation of his Trial, to have free access to those secret documents, and even, according to one author, to carry away some of them from their temporary place of deposit at the Colonial Secretary's office. It has been alleged that Governor Bowring has been heard to declare that it was ordered by himself.

22. It has been further admitted by the then Acting Colonial Secretary, on oath, that Dr. Bridges had access to these documents.

20. Mr. Tarrant was also believed to have been involved in the matter, at least, by his examination in the Supreme Court.

"For the interposition of the parties mentioned in the Chinese Secretary's letter of 12th October, it is probable that the Documents in question 'were in his official custody, and were used as evidence on cross-examination of Lines Morgan Esq., a witness for the Crown in the Queen vs. Farrant case."

23. On the 23rd November, five weeks after the pirate's conviction, tears were shed by the Coroner. It is stated that in 1858, in the most important of those papers, evidence must have been given in the Hong Kong Supreme Court.

It is rumoured that a pardon would have been granted, and the point again lost by Sir John Bowring's Government.

23. A probability of such an event having reached the Queen's printer, Mr. Dixon, led to a contemptible and damnable trick being played by the perpetrators to get off Mah Wong before he came into Mr. Dixon's hands. They had come into his hands in the Government Gazette, and see Dawson's letter published in the China Mail of 27th June 1858, p. 41. (1st Col.)

21. In the meantime, Mr. Caldwell and Dr. Bridges supported the application of Mops Day, Counsel for the Crown, for a pardon. See letters of the 13th May 1858 to the Executive Councillor, and of the same date to the Attorney General.

The newspaper, the organ of the community, on 17th September, enumerated the crimes of the man and alluded to his pecuniary dealings with Mr. Caldwell, the Queen's printer. The Queen's printer made free use of a sort of Index to the contents of the pirate's books and papers, originally prepared by W. May himself, at the period of their first examination for use at the trials.

This Index was headed "Memoranda" and was sent by the Acting Colonial Secretary to his Excellency in Executive Council on 17th May 1858, with a request for a pardon. I again remind your Grace that Secretary of State Ford had already caused to be entered a nolle prosequi in respect of the united charge against the same prisoner, for the second offence, alleged to be much stronger than the first, and one unconnected with it.

The Chief Justice declared from the Bench that he did not, on 13th July 1858 (pp. 449, 1st Col.), and could not have ordered the nolle prosequi (pp. 61, 1st Col.; 62, 2nd Col.; 63, 2nd Col.; 88, 1st Col.).

24. Mr. Dixon was thereupon summoned by the Clerk of the Councils, in the name of the Governor, to attend the Executive Council and support his statement. Mr. Dixon's line of examination, he himself says, was adopted by the Council on 28th July 1858.

Page 79


Edit History

2026-05-18 14:51:08 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
78 M. Stace, had been allowed, during the preparation of his Trial, to have free access to those secret documents, and even, according to one author, to carry away some of them from their temporary place of deposit at the Colonial Secretary's office. It has been alleged that Governor Bowring has been heard to declare that it was ordered by himself. 22. It has been further admitted by the then Acting Colonial Secretary, on oath, that Dr. Bridges had access to these documents. 20. Mr. Tarrant was also believed to have been involved in the matter, at least, by his examination in the Supreme Court. "For the interposition of the parties mentioned in the Chinese Secretary's letter of 12th October, it is probable that the Documents in question 'were in his official custody, and were used as evidence on cross-examination of Lines Morgan Esq., a witness for the Crown in the Queen vs. Farrant case." 23. On the 23rd November, five weeks after the pirate's conviction, tears were shed by the Coroner. It is stated that in 1858, in the most important of those papers, evidence must have been given in the Hong Kong Supreme Court. It is rumoured that a pardon would have been granted, and the point again lost by Sir John Bowring's Government. 23. A probability of such an event having reached the Queen's printer, Mr. Dixon, led to a contemptible and damnable trick being played by the perpetrators to get off Mah Wong before he came into Mr. Dixon's hands. They had come into his hands in the Government Gazette, and see Dawson's letter published in the China Mail of 27th June 1858, p. 41. (1st Col.) 21. In the meantime, Mr. Caldwell and Dr. Bridges supported the application of Mops Day, Counsel for the Crown, for a pardon. See letters of the 13th May 1858 to the Executive Councillor, and of the same date to the Attorney General. The newspaper, the organ of the community, on 17th September, enumerated the crimes of the man and alluded to his pecuniary dealings with Mr. Caldwell, the Queen's printer. The Queen's printer made free use of a sort of Index to the contents of the pirate's books and papers, originally prepared by W. May himself, at the period of their first examination for use at the trials. This Index was headed "Memoranda" and was sent by the Acting Colonial Secretary to his Excellency in Executive Council on 17th May 1858, with a request for a pardon. I again remind your Grace that Secretary of State Ford had already caused to be entered a nolle prosequi in respect of the united charge against the same prisoner, for the second offence, alleged to be much stronger than the first, and one unconnected with it. The Chief Justice declared from the Bench that he did not, on 13th July 1858 (pp. 449, 1st Col.), and could not have ordered the nolle prosequi (pp. 61, 1st Col.; 62, 2nd Col.; 63, 2nd Col.; 88, 1st Col.). 24. Mr. Dixon was thereupon summoned by the Clerk of the Councils, in the name of the Governor, to attend the Executive Council and support his statement. Mr. Dixon's line of examination, he himself says, was adopted by the Council on 28th July 1858. Page 79
Baseline (Original)
78 M. Stace, had been allowed, during the preparation his Frial, to have free, access to those seps docunculs, and even, according to one author carry that stres Governor has been heard to declare that it was ordered by huurself. - 22. It has been further admitted by the then 1 them away from teinporcery place of Bridges hirdenecon Aching Colonial) Secretary-and on oath that- but. 20. M was also believed. Tarrant eetl by, at least, the by raamination in the " for the interposition of the parties mentioned in 6. Clunese Secretory, as early as the 12th October 1st Hong Hong the heat following paragraph, probably as the parden at which period the Documents in question "preve reidence on crops texam sination of Lines Moregan Esg: (a toitness for the supposed to be in his official custody, and Crown in the Queen & Farrant ow 23° Nov? Zustay five weeks after the pirates conviction, tears Corest 2. Your 1858 in the most important of those papers must have kose his Evidence Hong Kong Supreme. 7, Couch. out would have been granted, and the pointe again lot - Society by Sir John/Bowring's Government. ~ rumour of lerse on 23. A the -probability of such an event having reached the Queen's printer, M.- Mr 4, bry a contriptible, and damnable trick abi supid; and see Dweson, the latters published; in the Government ' part of the perpetrators, to get off Mah lithe China Mail "'Wong, before they came into his (Mr. Mong 1857. Ib. Ib. And compare his hauds. - They had come into his hands' evedence before the horn mping de in Printed Minutes or Missbend Day. 27th June 1858. p. 41. (1. C.) "See, thre proceduigs or 30th of the previous month 21. In the meantine Mr. Caldwell and the dues v-Daragh Budges - himself. Queen 2 1858 and see my letters aw Executive Counciller Supreme Court For Supporting the application of Mops Day, Counsely and Place/_ttie Attorney, for the Com of the 13th May 1858 to Dr. Bridge's and of the .64. the name the crimes Newspaper 17 Sept. organ of the 17th September to protect in of the community. In enumerating. cimes of the man, and in alluding to his pecumiary dealings with Mr. Caldwell the Queen's printer made free use of sort of Index to the contents of the pirate's books and papers, originally prepared by W= Mary lunself, at the period of use at the trials their first examination for This Index was headed Memoranda, and Acting Colonial sectary to his Excellency in Executive Council, for 17th. Hay 1858 to the pardon I again remmid your Grace that Secretary of State Ford one had already caused to be eutored) a Hauley M.P. See also printed Muntes & for prosegue, in respect of the untied charge, again the widence of Hep the same prisoner, for the second offence, alle Kingsmill and Daires Fifteenth seventeenth much stronger one than the first, and one cubes Eighteenth & twenty second days 20% and unconicoted with it - that the Chief histion 30% have 4-ft and declared from the Bench, that he did not 13th, hely 1858 pp. 449. (1+ Col) 61 (1! Col)) could not have ordered the volle prosequi); 62[22? Col) 63 (200 Cot) &88 (10! Col) Gi a ! is styled throughout the subsequent narrative 24. Mr Dixson was thereupon summoned by the Clerk of the Councils, in the name of the Governor to attend the Executive lamoil and support his fortiumento The وقع Mr. Dexson's towing line of examination, he himself says, adopted by Day 28th Indy 18580 i did ollenutes &ifter Excellency [13] fol) and his depo- The Iden forest, in as theirwa, was so nesided on 15 D
2026-05-18 14:51:08 · Baseline
View content

78

M. Stace, had been allowed, during the preparation his Frial, to have free, access to those seps docunculs, and even, according to one author

carry

that stres Governor has been heard to declare that it was ordered by huurself. -

22. It has been further admitted by the then

1 them away from teinporcery place of Bridges hirdenecon Aching Colonial) Secretary-and on oath that- but.

20. M

was also believed.

Tarrant eetl

by, at least, the by raamination in the

" for the interposition of the parties mentioned in 6. Clunese Secretory, as early as the 12th October 1st Hong Hong the heat following paragraph, probably

as the parden at which period the Documents in question "preve

reidence on crops texam sination of Lines Moregan

Esg: (a toitness for the supposed to be in his official custody, and

Crown in the Queen

& Farrant ow

23° Nov?

Zustay five weeks after the pirates conviction, tears

Corest

2. Your 1858 in the most important of those papers must have kose his Evidence

Hong Kong Supreme. 7,

Couch.

out

would have been granted, and the pointe again lot - Society by Sir John/Bowring's Government. ~ rumour of

lerse on

23. A

the

-probability of such an event having reached the Queen's printer, M.-

Mr

4, bry

a contriptible, and damnable trick abi supid; and see Dweson, the latters published; in the Government ' part of the perpetrators, to get off Mah lithe China Mail "'Wong, before they came into his (Mr. Mong 1857. Ib. Ib. And compare his hauds. - They had come into his hands'

evedence before the horn mping de in Printed Minutes or Missbend Day. 27th June 1858. p. 41. (1. C.)

"See, thre proceduigs

or 30th of the previous month

21. In the meantine Mr. Caldwell and

the dues v-Daragh Budges - himself.

Queen

2

1858 and see my

letters

aw Executive Counciller

Supreme Court For Supporting the application of Mops Day,

Counsely and Place/_ttie Attorney, for the Com

of the 13th May 1858 to

Dr. Bridge's and of the

.64.

the name

the crimes

Newspaper 17 Sept. organ of the 17th September to protect in

of the community. In enumerating. cimes of the man, and in alluding to his pecumiary dealings with Mr. Caldwell the Queen's printer made free

use of sort of Index to the contents of the pirate's books and papers, originally prepared by W= Mary

lunself, at the period of

use at the trials their first examination for

This Index was headed Memoranda, and

Acting Colonial sectary to his Excellency in Executive Council, for 17th. Hay 1858 to the pardon – I again remmid your Grace that Secretary of State Ford

one had already caused to be eutored) a Hauley M.P. See also printed Muntes & for prosegue, in respect of the untied charge, again the widence of Hep the same prisoner, for the second offence, alle Kingsmill and Daires Fifteenth seventeenth much stronger one than the first, and one cubes Eighteenth & twenty

second days 20% and unconicoted with it - that the Chief histion

30% have 4-ft and declared from the Bench, that he did not 13th, hely 1858 pp. 449.

(1+ Col) 61 (1! Col)) could not have ordered the volle prosequi); 62[22? Col) 63 (200 Cot) &88 (10! Col)

Gi

a

!

is

styled throughout the subsequent

narrative

24. Mr Dixson was thereupon summoned by the Clerk of the Councils, in the name

of the Governor to attend the Executive lamoil and support his fortiumento

The

وقع

Mr. Dexson's towing line of examination, he himself says, adopted by

Day 28th Indy 18580

i did ollenutes &ifter Excellency

[13] fol) and his depo-

The Iden forest, in

as theirwa, was so nesided

on

15

D

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.